llmwiki

LLM Wiki for Researchers: Literature Reviews & Zotero

LLM Wiki for grad students and analysts. Manage 100+ papers, citation graphs, and literature reviews with Zotero, Claude, and a tested schema.
Apr 14, 2026

You are managing 50, 100, maybe 300 academic papers across multiple projects. Zotero is full, your Obsidian vault has half-written notes you cannot find anymore, and your literature review draft has been at 40% complete for three months. The LLM Wiki pattern was built for exactly this. This page collects every aillm.wiki resource for researchers, grad students, post-docs, analysts, and consultants running an LLM Wiki against a paper-heavy reading list. New to the pattern? The plain-English primer is a 5-minute read.

Why researchers get the most out of LLM Wiki

Academic work has four characteristics that make it the ideal LLM Wiki use case:

  1. Sources are structured. Papers share a common skeleton (title, authors, methods, results) that schemas capture in a few lines.
  2. Citations matter. You already think in "this paper extends that one" — wikilinks map directly onto a citation graph.
  3. You re-read the same material. A compiled wiki answers the same question consistently across sessions; raw chat does not.
  4. The corpus is bounded. Most dissertations draw on 200-400 papers — well within wiki territory, no RAG needed.

Core reading (in order)

  1. What is LLM Wiki? — the conceptual primer
  2. LLM Wiki for research: a practical guide for academics — the full Zotero-to-wiki workflow
  3. LLM Wiki vs RAG: when to use which — important if your library is over 500 papers

These three pieces will get you to a working research wiki by Sunday night.

The research-specific schema (free)

Our free schema starter pack ships with a tuned academic research schema that handles paper / author / concept / dataset / method as first-class entity types, plus the relationships between them (CITES, EXTENDS, CONTRADICTS, USES). Drop it into your wiki's meta/schema.md and you have a working starting point. For most readers managing under ~150 papers, the free schema plus the research walkthrough is enough to get a working literature wiki by the weekend.

Your next step

If you want the polished version of this workflow, the LLM Wiki Starter Kit is the only product we are shipping right now. It is developer-leaning by default, but the bundled schema.md blueprints include the same academic schema you see in the free pack — just paired with a working ingest pipeline and a video walkthrough. It includes:

  • 5 tuned CLAUDE.md files (general, research, engineering, product, SEO)
  • 5 matching schema.md blueprints — including the academic one
  • A production ingest.py that drops sources into your wiki and asks Claude to compile them
  • A lint.py script with auto-fix suggestions
  • A video walkthrough from zero to first compiled page
  • Lifetime updates

A deeper Research Edition (Zotero pipeline, BibTeX import, citation-graph configuration) is on the roadmap, but we are not collecting a separate waitlist for it yet — see the Templates page for the honest scope statement. Subscribers below will be the first to hear when the Research Edition opens.

$19 launch price for waitlist subscribers, $29 after. One-time purchase, no subscription.

Join the LLM Wiki Starter Kit waitlist

Get the $19 launch price + first notice when the Research Edition opens

FAQ for researchers

Will this work with my existing Zotero library?

Yes. The Research Edition includes a script that exports your Zotero library to BibTeX + PDFs, then feeds each paper to Claude with the right schema. Works against libraries up to ~500 papers in one pass.

Do I have to read every paper before adding it?

No, and that is the point. Drop a paper into raw/ and let Claude extract the metadata, key claims, and methods. You can then read the LLM-generated summary first and decide whether the full paper is worth your time. This is how readers find papers that have been sitting in their Zotero unread for two years.

How does it handle conflicting findings?

Every wiki page has an Open Questions section that gets populated when a new source contradicts an existing page. Over time, your literature-review.md accumulates these flagged contradictions — and that is where most original contributions live. Your dissertation's "gap in the literature" section is literally the compiled Open Questions of your wiki.

Can I use this for a systematic review (PRISMA, etc.)?

Yes, with caveats. The LLM Wiki captures the structure but you still need to do the inclusion/exclusion decisions yourself. Several PhD candidates use the pattern as the screening layer for systematic reviews — the wiki helps you decide which 60 papers out of 600 deserve full reading.

Will it cite correctly?

The schema captures BibTeX-compatible metadata, so generating a properly-formatted bibliography from your wiki is straightforward. We ship a script that exports the wiki's papers/ folder back to BibTeX with one command.

We publish weekly schema patterns and reader case studies — many of our most-cited posts come from the academic side of the audience. Subscribe below.

LLM Wiki for Researchers: Literature Reviews & Zotero